In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff


We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.







Try Advanced Search


  1. Gently Admitting Your Political Position
  2. More Finds
  3. Blogging Note
  4. More Conservative Than Liberal
  5. Bagatelles
  6. Weight and Brains
  7. Bill Links
  8. Finds
  9. Ears Are Ugly
  10. Popular History = Drama


CultureBlogs
• Sasha Castel
• AC Douglas
• Out of Lascaux
• The Ambler
• PhilosoBlog
• Modern Art Notes
• Cranky Professor
• Mike Snider on Poetry
• Silliman on Poetry
• Felix Salmon
• Gregdotorg
• BookSlut
• Polly Frost
• Polly and Ray's Forum
• Cronaca
• Plep
• Stumbling Tongue
• Brian's Culture Blog
• Banana Oil
• Scourge of Modernism
• Visible Darkness
• Seablogger
• Thomas Hobbs
• Blog Lodge
• Leibman Theory
• Goliard Dream
•
Third Level Digression
• Here Inside
• My Stupid Dog
• W.J. Duquette


Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
• Andrew Sullivan
• The Corner at National Review
• Steve Sailer
• Samizdata
• Junius
• Joanne Jacobs
• CalPundit
• Natalie Solent
• A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
• Rational Parenting
• Public Interest.co.uk
• Colby Cosh
• View from the Right
• Pejman Pundit
• Spleenville
• God of the Machine
• One Good Turn
• CinderellaBloggerfella
• Liberty Log
• Daily Pundit
• InstaPundit
• MindFloss
• Catallaxy Files
• Greatest Jeneration
• Glenn Frazier
• Jane Galt
• Jim Miller
• Limbic Nutrition
• Innocents Abroad
• Chicago Boyz
• James Lileks
• Cybrarian at Large
• Hello Bloggy!
• Setting the World to Rights
• Travelling Shoes


Miscellaneous
• Redwood Dragon
• IMAO
• The Invisible Hand
• ScrappleFace
• Daze Reader
• Lynn Sislo
• The Fat Guy
• Jon Walz

Links


Our Last 50 Referrers







« Popular History = Drama | Main | Finds »

August 24, 2009

Ears Are Ugly

Donald Pittenger writes:

Dear Blowhards --

The punchline is the title of this posting.

Have you ever given human ears a good, hard look? They're oddly shaped. Skin curling, folding, even drooping. All this concentrated into areas a couple of inches high and about an inch and a half wide. Tacked on the side of a smooth part of the head. And sometimes sticking out like air brakes on the sides of a F-86 Sabre jet fighter.

I'll admit that some ears are less awful than most. Delicate ears that lie fairly flat against the head of a pert young woman can be tolerable -- especially in comparison to those of president Lyndon B. Johnson.

Still, from a purely sexual-aesthetic standpoint, how did the human race survive with everyone sporting such seeming deformities? We should have become extinct due to mutual gross-out.

I have a hypothesis: We tune them out.

That's when they aren't explicitly hidden by being covered over by hair, as many women's hairdos do.

When looking at someone's head we tend to focus on the eyes (especially), mouth, nose, chin and other features of the face itself. If one is within a couple of feet of the other person and focusing frontally on the face, features farther away, including the ears, fall slightly out of focus and therefore aren't being noticed.

Hmm. Depth-of-field as a survival mechanism. Interesting concept.

Later,

Donald

posted by Donald at August 24, 2009




Comments

Desmond Morris in "The Naked Ape" noted that chimpanzees don't have earlobes and thinks earlobes evolved for sexual purposes. Whatever truth there is in that, I think ears are cute.

Posted by: hello on August 24, 2009 9:01 PM



There are societies which deliberately distort the shapes of ears, typically by attaching stone weights (Easter Island) or elaborate hoops (Africa) or pendant jewels (USA), evidently with the idea of focusing attention on them. Apologies for the blow to your scientific career, but I don't think the "tune 'em out" hypothesis is going to work.

Posted by: mike shupp on August 25, 2009 12:21 AM



It's also odd that human eyes, mouths, and even noses all seem to have less variation in shape and proportion than ears. A result of selection pressure on the visually more important features?

Posted by: PapayaSF on August 25, 2009 1:20 AM



I have heard it said that human ears look wrong, but I never considered why that should be. If I, a layman, had to hazard a guess, it would probably be something silly like maximum surface area for cooling near the brain.

Posted by: Mark on August 25, 2009 2:15 AM



I'll say it: I like ears! My wife's are adorable, they stick out a bit like elf ears.

Posted by: JV on August 25, 2009 1:45 PM



I'd have to say I'm mildy pro-ear. They're a little gnarly, or maybe baroque is the right word. Or rococo. But you know, kind of cool and organic.

Posted by: Bhh on August 25, 2009 9:31 PM



I've always been a fan of baby ears.
Some are so exquisite they take my
breath away.

Posted by: James on August 26, 2009 12:57 PM






Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:



Remember your info?