In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff


We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.







Try Advanced Search


  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...


CultureBlogs
Sasha Castel
AC Douglas
Out of Lascaux
The Ambler
PhilosoBlog
Modern Art Notes
Cranky Professor
Mike Snider on Poetry
Silliman on Poetry
Felix Salmon
Gregdotorg
BookSlut
Polly Frost
Polly and Ray's Forum
Cronaca
Plep
Stumbling Tongue
Brian's Culture Blog
Banana Oil
Scourge of Modernism
Visible Darkness
Seablogger
Thomas Hobbs
Blog Lodge
Leibman Theory
Goliard Dream
Third Level Digression
Here Inside
My Stupid Dog
W.J. Duquette


Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
Andrew Sullivan
The Corner at National Review
Steve Sailer
Samizdata
Junius
Joanne Jacobs
CalPundit
Natalie Solent
A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
Rational Parenting
Public Interest.co.uk
Colby Cosh
View from the Right
Pejman Pundit
Spleenville
God of the Machine
One Good Turn
CinderellaBloggerfella
Liberty Log
Daily Pundit
InstaPundit
MindFloss
Catallaxy Files
Greatest Jeneration
Glenn Frazier
Jane Galt
Jim Miller
Limbic Nutrition
Innocents Abroad
Chicago Boyz
James Lileks
Cybrarian at Large
Hello Bloggy!
Setting the World to Rights
Travelling Shoes


Miscellaneous
Redwood Dragon
IMAO
The Invisible Hand
ScrappleFace
Daze Reader
Lynn Sislo
The Fat Guy
Jon Walz

Links


Our Last 50 Referrers







« Sex and Eroticism Linkage | Main | Fact for the Day »

May 22, 2009

Cars 70 Years Ago: Not So Big

Donald Pittenger writes:

Dear Blowhards --

Not long ago James Lileks (his site is here) posted the photo of a Minneapolis building shown below. His interest was in the building's history, mine is different.

Minneapolis%20street%20with%20cars%20-%201939.jpg

As the banners indicate, the photo seems to have been taken in 1939. A couple of cars near the center of the photo seem to be 1939 models: the rest are older, as one would expect.

Now look at the people near the cars, because they provide scale. Note how short and narrow the cars are. They are typical of the 1930s. Luxury cars such as Packards and Cadillacs were larger (longer, for the most part, but not much wider).

By 1970, American cars were quite large, the growth trend having begun to develop seriously when the first redesigned postwar models appeared in 1947-49. I remember that advertisements crowed about six-passenger seating. But even so, a while back I was startled when viewing a parked 1950 Buick Special to notice that it seem narrower than I remembered them.

Nowadays, cars come in a larger variety of sizes and types and comparable street scenes should reflect that.

Later,

Donald

posted by Michael at May 22, 2009




Comments

Interiors in those cars were cramped. But the exteriors, especially the bulging fenders, made those cars appear larger than they actually were. There has been a lot of design progress to make today's cars look smaller, yet offer larger interior space. I guess this is a long-winded way of describing an optical illusion.

Posted by: Charlton Griffin on May 22, 2009 1:44 PM



Another element of the illusion is that, for me at least, the cars of the 50s looked huge because I was a small child. The perspective changed as I grew older.

Posted by: Lesthanzero on May 23, 2009 12:15 PM



But also note that the people were smaller too. Smaller, and narrower, like the cars. This was before the age of fast food and slovenliness!

Posted by: Boadicea on May 23, 2009 12:30 PM



No car seat laws. Or seatbelt laws, for that matter.

I don't care how immaculate your diet is or how trim and narrow your family is; you just can't jam five people into the same amount of space as you could in the Good Old Days, if they're all harnessed in accordance with the law today.

Posted by: omw on May 26, 2009 1:34 PM






Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:



Remember your info?