In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff


We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.







Try Advanced Search


  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...


CultureBlogs
• Sasha Castel
• AC Douglas
• Out of Lascaux
• The Ambler
• PhilosoBlog
• Modern Art Notes
• Cranky Professor
• Mike Snider on Poetry
• Silliman on Poetry
• Felix Salmon
• Gregdotorg
• BookSlut
• Polly Frost
• Polly and Ray's Forum
• Cronaca
• Plep
• Stumbling Tongue
• Brian's Culture Blog
• Banana Oil
• Scourge of Modernism
• Visible Darkness
• Seablogger
• Thomas Hobbs
• Blog Lodge
• Leibman Theory
• Goliard Dream
•
Third Level Digression
• Here Inside
• My Stupid Dog
• W.J. Duquette


Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
• Andrew Sullivan
• The Corner at National Review
• Steve Sailer
• Samizdata
• Junius
• Joanne Jacobs
• CalPundit
• Natalie Solent
• A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
• Rational Parenting
• Public Interest.co.uk
• Colby Cosh
• View from the Right
• Pejman Pundit
• Spleenville
• God of the Machine
• One Good Turn
• CinderellaBloggerfella
• Liberty Log
• Daily Pundit
• InstaPundit
• MindFloss
• Catallaxy Files
• Greatest Jeneration
• Glenn Frazier
• Jane Galt
• Jim Miller
• Limbic Nutrition
• Innocents Abroad
• Chicago Boyz
• James Lileks
• Cybrarian at Large
• Hello Bloggy!
• Setting the World to Rights
• Travelling Shoes


Miscellaneous
• Redwood Dragon
• IMAO
• The Invisible Hand
• ScrappleFace
• Daze Reader
• Lynn Sislo
• The Fat Guy
• Jon Walz

Links


Our Last 50 Referrers







« Dressing Up is Hard to Do | Main | Pulp: Original and Recycled »

March 16, 2009

Food, Eating, Health Linkage

Michael Blowhard writes:

Dear Blowhards --

* Did the discovery of cooking enable us to grow bigger brains?

* Rich Green explains some of the reasons why the quarrels over raw milk are about more than just raw milk. They're of political interest too.

* Dr. Mary Dan Eades lists her favorite cookbooks.

* Men and women have their own, different ways of going about losing weight.

* Scott Sonnon thinks that exercisers ought to be wary of regimes and instructors who are too hard-driving. My own exercise philosophy (small joke) doesn't consist of much more than "First, don't hurt yourself."

* Orange juice is seeming a little less appealing these days ...

Bonus link: Is Gobekli, in Eastern Turkey, the most important archaeological site in the world?

Best,

Michael

posted by Michael at March 16, 2009




Comments

And then there’s the self-help model of weight loss, the tell-all meetings designed for sharing. Men hate them. And why not? They’ve been socialized to hide their feelings.

Nope. That's not it at all. We don't hate "tell-all meetings" because we've been socialized to. Not at all.

The article was also strangely diffident about pointing out one of the major reasons men lose weight more easily than women: biology.

Odd, how something as obvious as the biological differences between the bodies (the physiologies) of men and women is still taboo talk in ultra-feminized early 21st North Am. Why this is so is a mystery to me. You can't even point out that women are physically frail compared to men without arousing all sorts of bizarre knee-jerk responses. Out at Crossfit, generally a fairly macho place, someone recently made a fool of himself by stating that it's only a stereotype that men are stronger than women. At least he didn't disgrace what was left of his male integrity (i.e. concern for objective, actual, out-there, physical, observable, measureable REALITY) by saying that it's not true that women are weaker than men.

"Stereotype." What a great weasel word for our Weasel Age. You can say something isn't true without coming right out and saying it...and then having to back up your claim with reference to all those male things like facts, logic, evidence and reason.

Posted by: PatrickH on March 16, 2009 7:38 PM



Commercial OJ is dreck. I'm a lucky guy, I have 13 full size, mature citrus trees on my property. We get thousands of oranges between January and May. We're getting about a gallon of juice a day from them now, and it's fresh-picked and organic too! Nothing is more refreshing.

BTW, I really enjoy your diet links, I've learned so much from them, particularly the recent one about Omega3's.

Posted by: Todd Fletcher on March 16, 2009 7:38 PM



Gobekli as garden of Eden? The minute I see stoned like that I think servitude and class rule, not the garden of Eden, a place of leisure and liberty.

Posted by: Luke Lea on March 17, 2009 11:51 AM






Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:



Remember your info?