In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff


We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.







Try Advanced Search


  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...


CultureBlogs
Sasha Castel
AC Douglas
Out of Lascaux
The Ambler
PhilosoBlog
Modern Art Notes
Cranky Professor
Mike Snider on Poetry
Silliman on Poetry
Felix Salmon
Gregdotorg
BookSlut
Polly Frost
Polly and Ray's Forum
Cronaca
Plep
Stumbling Tongue
Brian's Culture Blog
Banana Oil
Scourge of Modernism
Visible Darkness
Seablogger
Thomas Hobbs
Blog Lodge
Leibman Theory
Goliard Dream
Third Level Digression
Here Inside
My Stupid Dog
W.J. Duquette


Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
Andrew Sullivan
The Corner at National Review
Steve Sailer
Samizdata
Junius
Joanne Jacobs
CalPundit
Natalie Solent
A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
Rational Parenting
Public Interest.co.uk
Colby Cosh
View from the Right
Pejman Pundit
Spleenville
God of the Machine
One Good Turn
CinderellaBloggerfella
Liberty Log
Daily Pundit
InstaPundit
MindFloss
Catallaxy Files
Greatest Jeneration
Glenn Frazier
Jane Galt
Jim Miller
Limbic Nutrition
Innocents Abroad
Chicago Boyz
James Lileks
Cybrarian at Large
Hello Bloggy!
Setting the World to Rights
Travelling Shoes


Miscellaneous
Redwood Dragon
IMAO
The Invisible Hand
ScrappleFace
Daze Reader
Lynn Sislo
The Fat Guy
Jon Walz

Links


Our Last 50 Referrers







« Please Explain: Cezanne | Main | Traveling to Buy Stuff »

October 31, 2008

Weight

Michael Blowhard writes:

Dear Blowhards --

* Obese people anticipate enjoying food more than lean people do -- but when they actually eat it, they enjoy it less.

* Diabetes is 'way up. (A small immigration angle here: "Diabetes is two to three times more common in Mexican American ... adults than in non-Hispanic whites." In other words, one reason the U.S.'s diabetes problem is becoming worse is that we have growing numbers of people of Mexican descent in the country. Not that you'll find this fact alluded to very often in the polite press ... )

* Dr. Michael Eades reports that obese people these days tend to underestimate how overweight they are. Why? Because fat has become the new normal. To demonstrate his point, Dr. Eades runs some clips of famous fatties from previous generations: Oliver Hardy, Curly of the Three Stooges, and Jackie Gleason, who called himself "The Fat Man." It's quite amazing how not-very-fat-at-all they look to present-day eyes. Big guys, sure. But not fat -- let alone obese -- by contempo standards. I'm not entirely surprised to learn that, where weight goes, surroundings do count. A major reason a Frenchperson will tend to be slim is that other Frenchpeople tend to be slim, for instance. And when the Wife and I visit relatives in the midwest, we giggle over the fact that we could put on 30 pounds each and still pass for slim among those sweet-natured but full-figured heartlanders.

* Learn about Intermittent Fasting from the experts.

Best,

Michael

posted by Michael at October 31, 2008




Comments

I took umbrage at your giggle at midwesterners. Google: "cdc U.S. obesity trends 1985-2007". The trend is lead by the southern states. The western states population are thinner, but little to distinguish midwest form the east coast.

Posted by: jz-md on October 31, 2008 10:52 AM



Well, the south, good lord ... At least the food there (soul food, southern cooking, etc) can tend to be delicious. The Wife and I each put on 10 pounds when we spent a couple of weeks there a few years back. It was all "joy of living" weight, let me tell you - gravies, pies, good fried food ... The food in the midwest these days is generally lousy. Hard to imagine eating enough of it to get fat. Funny fact: back prior to 1950, midwestern cooking was often really good.

But you don't see a lot of heftiness in the midwest when you're there? I'm surprised. My midwestern relatives and acquaintances talk about it (my "fullfigured" term is a joke I lifted from one of them). And when I was in a St. Louis hospital seven years ago all but one of the nurses who cared for me were huuuuuuuuuuge, as in "had to move the furniture aside just to make it across the room" huge. And they were nearly all in their 20s.

But you're right, the south clearly is leading in the extra-poundage sweepstakes.

Link.

Posted by: Michael Blowhard on October 31, 2008 11:02 AM



Is this pop science? Because the doctor told my husband the definition of diabetic had been changed, and where before he wouldn't have been diabetic, under the new definition he was. Diet and exercise took care of it in 3 mos. time.

Posted by: anonymousinTexas on October 31, 2008 12:40 PM



"The food in the midwest these days is generally lousy. Hard to imagine eating enough of it to get fat."

Midwesterners subscribe strongly to the philosophy that "the food is bad, but at least the portions are large" is the preferred model.

Posted by: CyndiF on October 31, 2008 1:54 PM



If you can't put on weight in the land of the all-you-can-eat pork barbecue, fried chicken, and fried-catfish with hushpuppies buffet, with ice cream and cobbler for dessert, then you can't put on weight anywhere.

Man, do I miss those places. Somebody needs to start one around Boston, and I mean in time for dinner tonight.

Posted by: Derek Lowe on October 31, 2008 2:29 PM



Beg to differ. Oliver Hardy and Jackie Gleason would have been fat in any era.

I claim no expertise in this area, but it seems to me the biggest obstacle people have to overcome when it comes to eating too much, myself included, is the food culture they were raised in. My mother was at best an average cook and the food she put on the table was unimaginative and only mildly tasteful but the portions were large. Nothing particularly wrong other than boring about a dinner plate consisting of london broil, mashed potatoes and string beans; but 2 slices of london broil instead of the 4 or 5 she put on the plate, a scoop instead of 2 or 3 scoops of the mashed potatoes, 6 string beans instead of 12 would have sated our hunger.

The habit of too much is almost impossible to break. To this day I "know" that very little food suffices to satisfy and fuel me, I'm not a laborer, but I still pile my plate high. In my experience it's very very difficult to break that imprinting.

Posted by: ricpic on October 31, 2008 3:41 PM






Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:



Remember your info?