In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff


We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.







Try Advanced Search


  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...


CultureBlogs
• Sasha Castel
• AC Douglas
• Out of Lascaux
• The Ambler
• PhilosoBlog
• Modern Art Notes
• Cranky Professor
• Mike Snider on Poetry
• Silliman on Poetry
• Felix Salmon
• Gregdotorg
• BookSlut
• Polly Frost
• Polly and Ray's Forum
• Cronaca
• Plep
• Stumbling Tongue
• Brian's Culture Blog
• Banana Oil
• Scourge of Modernism
• Visible Darkness
• Seablogger
• Thomas Hobbs
• Blog Lodge
• Leibman Theory
• Goliard Dream
•
Third Level Digression
• Here Inside
• My Stupid Dog
• W.J. Duquette


Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
• Andrew Sullivan
• The Corner at National Review
• Steve Sailer
• Samizdata
• Junius
• Joanne Jacobs
• CalPundit
• Natalie Solent
• A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
• Rational Parenting
• Public Interest.co.uk
• Colby Cosh
• View from the Right
• Pejman Pundit
• Spleenville
• God of the Machine
• One Good Turn
• CinderellaBloggerfella
• Liberty Log
• Daily Pundit
• InstaPundit
• MindFloss
• Catallaxy Files
• Greatest Jeneration
• Glenn Frazier
• Jane Galt
• Jim Miller
• Limbic Nutrition
• Innocents Abroad
• Chicago Boyz
• James Lileks
• Cybrarian at Large
• Hello Bloggy!
• Setting the World to Rights
• Travelling Shoes


Miscellaneous
• Redwood Dragon
• IMAO
• The Invisible Hand
• ScrappleFace
• Daze Reader
• Lynn Sislo
• The Fat Guy
• Jon Walz

Links


Our Last 50 Referrers







« Western New York Visited | Main | All the Bailout with None of the Corruption »

September 26, 2008

Exercise/Eating

Michael Blowhard writes:

Dear Blowhards --

We're fatter these days partly because we move less than people used to. That's the standard expert's analysis and diagnosis, of course. But is it correct? Perhaps it's also possible that people get fat first, and only then move less.

Gary Taubes explains to Jimmy Moore that the direction causation flows in is anything but as clear as the routine authorities would have you believe. Stephan takes on the same question.

I found Gary Taubes' epic "Good Calories, Bad Calories" to be a real eye-opener. Much of what we've been told about eating, food, health, fat, and cholesterol for the last 40 years has been either demonstrably wrong, or based on flimsy evidence and weak experiments.

Cheery news: More evidence that small amounts of dark chocolate are good for you. I'm off to have some.

Best,

Michael

posted by Michael at September 26, 2008




Comments

Darn. Why couldn't it have been milk chocolate?

Posted by: tvoh on September 27, 2008 10:17 AM



I'm not sure that Taubes fully convinced me that he is right, but he certainly did convince me that the "standard model" of recommended nutrition and diet is essentially based on nothing, and may actually be harmful. The push in the 1970's was to "do something" to solve the "crisis" before we were sure about the information we were acting on (gee, where have we heard that before?) and this, as so often happens, made things worse. The impulse to "do something" before we really know what the Hell is going on has probably caused this country more grief in the last 40 years than just about any other factor, and the end is not yet. Financial crisis, global warming, Iran, Georgia, ADHD anyone?

Posted by: Tschafer on September 27, 2008 10:48 AM



TVOH -- Because milk chocolate is passe and I'm a fashion-victim.

Tschafer -- That's one of the best pithy-yet-accurate summaries of recent decades I've ever read. That "something needs to be done" compulsion is a real puzzler, isn't it? Why did the US suddenly become possessed by it? I blame drugs and the '60s myself, but I don't really know what I'm talking about ...

Posted by: Michael Blowhard on September 27, 2008 11:23 AM



And, I adore milk chocolate. Typical.

Why is it that people are always looking for the magic food, er, bullet? I think we all know what we need to do better to stay healthy, but ah, self-discipline! It's an eternal problem, isn't it :)

Posted by: MD on September 27, 2008 2:51 PM



Excessive concern about something as fundamentally trivial as diet, exercise, physical appearance, and the other "crises" that periodically "exercise" us is a luxury of an advanced civilization that is, precisely, undergoing no crises at all.

Let me also say that milk chocolate is a guilty pleasure of mine. Dark chocolate is a duty. I do like it, but it doesn't give me that yummy yummy yummy I got love in my tummy feeling that milk chocolate does. Sigh.

Posted by: PatrickH on September 27, 2008 5:54 PM






Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:



Remember your info?