In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff

We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.

Try Advanced Search

  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...

Sasha Castel
AC Douglas
Out of Lascaux
The Ambler
Modern Art Notes
Cranky Professor
Mike Snider on Poetry
Silliman on Poetry
Felix Salmon
Polly Frost
Polly and Ray's Forum
Stumbling Tongue
Brian's Culture Blog
Banana Oil
Scourge of Modernism
Visible Darkness
Thomas Hobbs
Blog Lodge
Leibman Theory
Goliard Dream
Third Level Digression
Here Inside
My Stupid Dog
W.J. Duquette

Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
Andrew Sullivan
The Corner at National Review
Steve Sailer
Joanne Jacobs
Natalie Solent
A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
Rational Parenting
Colby Cosh
View from the Right
Pejman Pundit
God of the Machine
One Good Turn
Liberty Log
Daily Pundit
Catallaxy Files
Greatest Jeneration
Glenn Frazier
Jane Galt
Jim Miller
Limbic Nutrition
Innocents Abroad
Chicago Boyz
James Lileks
Cybrarian at Large
Hello Bloggy!
Setting the World to Rights
Travelling Shoes

Redwood Dragon
The Invisible Hand
Daze Reader
Lynn Sislo
The Fat Guy
Jon Walz


Our Last 50 Referrers

« The End of Flashman | Main | Help Me »

January 04, 2008


Michael Blowhard writes:

Dear Blowhards --

* Jimmy Moore comes up with a Presidential nominee I could get behind.

* A blog's gotta have a theme, I guess.

* Philip Weiss has a daring wrestle with that most taboo of thinkers, Kevin MacDonald.

* DVD Spin Doctor lists his top 20 DVDs of 2007.

* Kirsten Mortensen says goodbye to a loved but difficult dog.

* Author Mark Lilla writes that commenters and bloggers have offered sharper responses to his recent book than trad book reviewers have. Who needs critics, eh?

* Reviewing a poetry collection, Prairie Mary gets off some shrewd observations about autobiographical writing, and about relationships between older men and younger women.

* Terrierman runs a gorgeous photo of an almost perfectly preserved baby mammoth.

* Katie Hutchison praises Shaker blue and a modest beach boardwalk. Why does anyone ask for anything more from architecture?

* Shouting Thomas recalls some lousy bands from the '60s. Man, there really were a lot of those around, weren't there?

* Derek Lowe confides that some -- and maybe even many -- scientists just aren't made to be managers.

* MBlowhard Rewind: I maintained back here that, where artchat goes, it's vitally important to distinguish between "modern" and "modernist." Don't let the bastards get away with claiming that modern has to imply modernist!



posted by Michael at January 4, 2008


Thanks for the plug, Michael.

I'm off to play with Saints & Sinners tonight, at the wonderful Skytop Lounge, in the heart of Kingston.

Big Joe, my lead guitar player, will be celebrating his 65th birthday.

Posted by: Shouting Thomas on January 4, 2008 5:50 PM

Hey ST:
Great list, but where is Crazy Horse? I guess they are more 70s than 60s, but god they suck. What was Neil Young thinking?

Steve Sailer has some thoughts here:

Posted by: Thursday on January 4, 2008 6:52 PM

Thanks for the link, Michael.

I liked your post also, Thomas. Truthfully a lot of the musicianship from 60s era recordings sounds pretty crude when you compare it to what earns commercial attention today. It's the four-minute-mile phenom in some respects: teenagers who form rock & roll bands now meet standards of musicianship that were unimaginable to youngsters 40 years ago, partly because today, they know it's possible.

Posted by: Kirsten on January 4, 2008 9:23 PM

Post a comment

Email Address:



Remember your info?