In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff

We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.

Try Advanced Search

  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...

Sasha Castel
AC Douglas
Out of Lascaux
The Ambler
Modern Art Notes
Cranky Professor
Mike Snider on Poetry
Silliman on Poetry
Felix Salmon
Polly Frost
Polly and Ray's Forum
Stumbling Tongue
Brian's Culture Blog
Banana Oil
Scourge of Modernism
Visible Darkness
Thomas Hobbs
Blog Lodge
Leibman Theory
Goliard Dream
Third Level Digression
Here Inside
My Stupid Dog
W.J. Duquette

Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
Andrew Sullivan
The Corner at National Review
Steve Sailer
Joanne Jacobs
Natalie Solent
A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
Rational Parenting
Colby Cosh
View from the Right
Pejman Pundit
God of the Machine
One Good Turn
Liberty Log
Daily Pundit
Catallaxy Files
Greatest Jeneration
Glenn Frazier
Jane Galt
Jim Miller
Limbic Nutrition
Innocents Abroad
Chicago Boyz
James Lileks
Cybrarian at Large
Hello Bloggy!
Setting the World to Rights
Travelling Shoes

Redwood Dragon
The Invisible Hand
Daze Reader
Lynn Sislo
The Fat Guy
Jon Walz


Our Last 50 Referrers

« Where are Cheech & Chong When You Need Them? | Main | Some Katie Opinions »

September 28, 2007

Jan's New Site

Michael Blowhard writes:

Dear Blowhards --

In a recent posting about website-making software I made quick mention of a wonderful culture-intellectual website known as Jahsonic. Word now comes that Jan, the inspired brain behind the site, is building a wiki version of Jahsonic. Go here and lose yourself in supersmart yet accessible pieces on irresistable topics like sex, film, art, and Camille Paglia. A reference book with a point of view -- as Rachael Ray might say, What's not great about that? Jan has already posted over 12,000 articles (many derived from Wikipedia) and is still at work. I'd love to see more people with powerful brains, info, and thinking to share build online wikis of what they have to say. (Friedrich von Blowhard, are you listening?) I think that my own version of an ideal website would be a cross between a blog and a wiki ...



posted by Michael at September 28, 2007


I went browsing there and reading and enjoyed myself, but of the three pieces I read, two were's proprietary reviews. Jan may be inviting some trouble there.

Posted by: Peter L. Winkler on September 29, 2007 10:57 PM

Dear Peter,

If you read Amazon reviews you must have spent time on does not feature proprietary reviews. was my earliest online effort at self-education which allowed me to arrive at a "vocabulary of culture", and the artists, theorists and tropes connected to them.

Dear Michael,
Thanks for plugging 'art and pop'. I am glad you mentioned the bliki phenomenon. You analyzed it correctly when you said the blog format encourages currency and the ephemeral, whereas the wiki symbolizes longevity.

Part of the reason of starting my own wiki was dissatisfaction with the policies at Wikipedia, their notability criteria which are different from mine, and their increasingly annoying political correctness (some say this, others say this, ...). The early days of Wikipedia were quite different. Part of my work is therefore to expose the inherent, but invisible biases of Wikipedia and other encyclopedias.

The way I see the bliki format is like this: the front end, one's posts are pretty much as in regular blogs. The back-end or the underlying layer of a bliki is where people can choose. You either 'plug-in' Wikipedia, if you are a ultra-right nationalist, you plug in, if you are conservative you plug in If you are into Zappa, you plug in the Zappa Wiki Jawaka.

All this allows like minded bloggers or bliki-ers to find themselves in the same namespace.

To illustrate what I mean, I have made an entry at my wiki for 2 Blowhards here. 'Plug in' this post at Wikipedia and you will get different links, ergo different meanings.


Posted by: Jan Geerinck on September 30, 2007 8:46 AM

Post a comment

Email Address:



Remember your info?