In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff


We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.







Try Advanced Search


  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...


CultureBlogs
Sasha Castel
AC Douglas
Out of Lascaux
The Ambler
PhilosoBlog
Modern Art Notes
Cranky Professor
Mike Snider on Poetry
Silliman on Poetry
Felix Salmon
Gregdotorg
BookSlut
Polly Frost
Polly and Ray's Forum
Cronaca
Plep
Stumbling Tongue
Brian's Culture Blog
Banana Oil
Scourge of Modernism
Visible Darkness
Seablogger
Thomas Hobbs
Blog Lodge
Leibman Theory
Goliard Dream
Third Level Digression
Here Inside
My Stupid Dog
W.J. Duquette


Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
Andrew Sullivan
The Corner at National Review
Steve Sailer
Samizdata
Junius
Joanne Jacobs
CalPundit
Natalie Solent
A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
Rational Parenting
Public Interest.co.uk
Colby Cosh
View from the Right
Pejman Pundit
Spleenville
God of the Machine
One Good Turn
CinderellaBloggerfella
Liberty Log
Daily Pundit
InstaPundit
MindFloss
Catallaxy Files
Greatest Jeneration
Glenn Frazier
Jane Galt
Jim Miller
Limbic Nutrition
Innocents Abroad
Chicago Boyz
James Lileks
Cybrarian at Large
Hello Bloggy!
Setting the World to Rights
Travelling Shoes


Miscellaneous
Redwood Dragon
IMAO
The Invisible Hand
ScrappleFace
Daze Reader
Lynn Sislo
The Fat Guy
Jon Walz

Links


Our Last 50 Referrers







« Clinton's Gifts | Main | DVD Journal: The Extras on "The Dreamers" »

March 28, 2007

My Heart Belongs to ...

Michael Blowhard writes:

Dear Blowhards --

Pussy Galore -- or rather Honor Blackman, who played the immortally-named character in the 1964 Bond film "Goldfinger" -- may be 79 years old these days, but she's as up-to-date as ever, and she still carries herself with an inspiring stylishness and confidence. She's a dynamo too. Blackman recently appeared in her own one-woman show, she conferred some glamor on a reality-TV series and, at the moment, she's about to step into a London production of "Cabaret." About Sean Connery she tells Stuart Jeffries: "Everybody thinks he was playing himself, but Bond isn't exactly an Edinburgh milkman. He's a fine figure of a man, sexy beyond belief."

Best,

Michael

posted by Michael at March 28, 2007




Comments

Ah, Pussy Galore -- not my favorite Bond girl, but the sheer outrageousness of the name makes me smile every time. How the hell did Fleming get away with it?

Posted by: Steve on March 28, 2007 3:48 PM



Why are bimbos always so adamant about not being bimbos?

For one thing, what's so bad about being a bimbo? I bet a lot of women would give their eye teeth to enter the ranks of bimbohood. Work it right and it's a meal-ticket for life. Or at least an entry-ticket to better things. Example: Blackman's own career.

Posted by: ricpic on March 28, 2007 5:09 PM



In 1950s and early 60s, "pussy" meant "kitty-cat" to most people. So "Pussy Galore" changed from a rather sly double entendre to a rather blatant one, and now maybe not a double entendre at all.

In 1972, Lou Reed could use the phrase "giving head" in Top 40 single ("Walk on the Wild Side"), 'cos nobody* knew what it meant!

*No parents anyway.

Posted by: Intellectual Pariah on March 28, 2007 5:43 PM



Good point Pariah -- still, even as a double entendre, it's pretty darn outrageous. My elementary school friends and I "got it" right away in the early '70s, so it couldn't have too sly in '64 (when the movie came out).

Posted by: Steve on March 28, 2007 6:15 PM






Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:



Remember your info?