In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff


We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.







Try Advanced Search


  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...


CultureBlogs
Sasha Castel
AC Douglas
Out of Lascaux
The Ambler
PhilosoBlog
Modern Art Notes
Cranky Professor
Mike Snider on Poetry
Silliman on Poetry
Felix Salmon
Gregdotorg
BookSlut
Polly Frost
Polly and Ray's Forum
Cronaca
Plep
Stumbling Tongue
Brian's Culture Blog
Banana Oil
Scourge of Modernism
Visible Darkness
Seablogger
Thomas Hobbs
Blog Lodge
Leibman Theory
Goliard Dream
Third Level Digression
Here Inside
My Stupid Dog
W.J. Duquette


Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
Andrew Sullivan
The Corner at National Review
Steve Sailer
Samizdata
Junius
Joanne Jacobs
CalPundit
Natalie Solent
A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
Rational Parenting
Public Interest.co.uk
Colby Cosh
View from the Right
Pejman Pundit
Spleenville
God of the Machine
One Good Turn
CinderellaBloggerfella
Liberty Log
Daily Pundit
InstaPundit
MindFloss
Catallaxy Files
Greatest Jeneration
Glenn Frazier
Jane Galt
Jim Miller
Limbic Nutrition
Innocents Abroad
Chicago Boyz
James Lileks
Cybrarian at Large
Hello Bloggy!
Setting the World to Rights
Travelling Shoes


Miscellaneous
Redwood Dragon
IMAO
The Invisible Hand
ScrappleFace
Daze Reader
Lynn Sislo
The Fat Guy
Jon Walz

Links


Our Last 50 Referrers







« The Novelization Game | Main | Dining Out »

March 25, 2007

Lily Vs. David

Michael Blowhard writes:

Dear Blowhards --

Actors: You can push 'em only so far ...

Directors: You can push them only so far too ...

Best,

Michael

posted by Michael at March 25, 2007




Comments

Can anyone honestly blame David Russell for having such a psychotic reaction to that woman? Poor, poor man.

Posted by: Cody on March 25, 2007 2:13 AM



Gee, I don't know, I think its kinda incumbent on directors to communicate about what they want their actors to do. These two clips seem to raise questions about how clear the director is on what he's going for.

So who posts these things? What are they, video feeds from the eyepiece of the camera?

Posted by: Friedrich von Blowhard on March 25, 2007 9:05 AM



I dunno, to me the director looks like a spoiled asshole. Besides, as Freidrich notes, being unprofessional.
I tend to subscribe to an old-fashioned theory that it is terribly rude and a sign of bad upbringing, when a younger person opens his dirty mouth on a older one, especially if the older one is a woman. I have a feeling if Ms.Tomlin wasn't in the in the position of an inferior employee, I expect she would be totally justified if she smack the nasty bastard upside the head and kicked him silly.
It looks like he used to be one of those public-nuisance yuppie kids that throw tantrums in restaurants and everybody act absent instead of teaching the kids manners...

Posted by: Tatyana on March 25, 2007 1:05 PM



Sorry, Cody, but word on Russell being a lunatic is well-established. Who knows who was dishing the dirty talk first, but I know enough about Ms. Tomlin (a patron of friends of mine) to know if she blew, things had to be egregious.

And yes, FvB--that is, in fact, the director's job on a set (in addition to establishing tone).

The footage is from the video assist, which gets a feed from the camera. That way, on a film shoot, the director (or studio flunkies, or whomever) can review takes on the set, and decide what needs to be printed, what can be tossed, what needs another take.

Posted by: communicatrix on March 25, 2007 7:56 PM



I kind of like the remix.

Posted by: David Fleck on March 27, 2007 6:37 PM






Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:



Remember your info?