In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff

We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.

Try Advanced Search

  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...

Sasha Castel
AC Douglas
Out of Lascaux
The Ambler
Modern Art Notes
Cranky Professor
Mike Snider on Poetry
Silliman on Poetry
Felix Salmon
Polly Frost
Polly and Ray's Forum
Stumbling Tongue
Brian's Culture Blog
Banana Oil
Scourge of Modernism
Visible Darkness
Thomas Hobbs
Blog Lodge
Leibman Theory
Goliard Dream
Third Level Digression
Here Inside
My Stupid Dog
W.J. Duquette

Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
Andrew Sullivan
The Corner at National Review
Steve Sailer
Joanne Jacobs
Natalie Solent
A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
Rational Parenting
Colby Cosh
View from the Right
Pejman Pundit
God of the Machine
One Good Turn
Liberty Log
Daily Pundit
Catallaxy Files
Greatest Jeneration
Glenn Frazier
Jane Galt
Jim Miller
Limbic Nutrition
Innocents Abroad
Chicago Boyz
James Lileks
Cybrarian at Large
Hello Bloggy!
Setting the World to Rights
Travelling Shoes

Redwood Dragon
The Invisible Hand
Daze Reader
Lynn Sislo
The Fat Guy
Jon Walz


Our Last 50 Referrers

« Housing Goes Bust? | Main | Genius of the People »

March 20, 2007


Michael Blowhard writes:

Dear Blowhards --

* Say hello to chagas, a recent immigrant from Latin America that's currently causing alarm in L.A.

* Tucson Weekly's Leo Banks spends some time exploring where and how illegals make their way into this country, and provides some remarkable snapshots of how absurd border matters have become. (Link thanks to Todd Fletcher.)

* Steve Sailer wonders what's so great about diversity.



posted by Michael at March 20, 2007


Diversity sucks.

Posted by: ricpic on March 20, 2007 6:13 PM

No shit.

You know what sucks even more?

The reaction to it wherein quasi-military authority is given unquestioned power, and the majority populace is more afraid of the action than the reaction.

Both are deep human nature.

Posted by: J. Goard on March 21, 2007 3:00 AM

It's funny the way "diversity" has become a kind of all-engulfing, always-anywhere-all-times ideal and good, isn't it? I mean, I like living a big-city life where it's diverse myself. I get a kick out of the range of people, the food, the cultures, the mess of it. But it isn't something I'd recommend to a lot of people, and it isn't something that's necessarily easy either. There's a cost to it. Crime, lack of trust ... But also the way it turns every day into a bit of a fight. Things get tribal very quickly, for one thing. For another, there are few assumptions and behaviors everyone shares. Sometimes this is cool, but sometimes it's a huge pain in the ass, or just dismaying or trying. In heartland America, for instance, I'm a fairly funny guy. I do droll and deadpan, and I can pretty much make people laugh at will. In diverse NYC, droll and deadpan doesn't work. You do it, and you aren't considered a likable funny guy, you're considered bizarre, and a loser. You're always having to do what you can to communicate past misunderstandings, which are legion. People don't automatically behave well in the usual American sense. They're often antagonistic.

Also, it isn't as if "diverse" means "anything goes," let alone "free and easy." I think that's the fantasy, isn't it? But in fact there are behaviors that tend to succeed in diverse areas better than others do. Loud and aggressive tend to prevail, for instance.

Anyway, the entire world is already hugely diverse, even in the strictly human-population-group sense. Why does every micro-unit within that macro-sphere also have to be "diverse"? The result of that would be uniform gray sludge. Isn't it more "diverse" to let people clump as they will and then enjoy the Diversity of It All by visiting it for yourself if/when you see fit?

I'm not quite sure how and why diversity became this overriding abstract ideal that our elites have determined they must pursue at all costs. Let alone what its appeal is, even in the abstract, to the elite mind. I did read that book, "Diversity the invention of an ideal," or whatever it was called, and it was pretty good...

Posted by: Michael Blowhard on March 21, 2007 9:45 AM

> "Diversity the invention of an ideal," or whatever it was called, and it was pretty good...

Posted by: James M. on March 21, 2007 5:13 PM

Post a comment

Email Address:



Remember your info?