In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff


We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.







Try Advanced Search


  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...


CultureBlogs
• Sasha Castel
• AC Douglas
• Out of Lascaux
• The Ambler
• PhilosoBlog
• Modern Art Notes
• Cranky Professor
• Mike Snider on Poetry
• Silliman on Poetry
• Felix Salmon
• Gregdotorg
• BookSlut
• Polly Frost
• Polly and Ray's Forum
• Cronaca
• Plep
• Stumbling Tongue
• Brian's Culture Blog
• Banana Oil
• Scourge of Modernism
• Visible Darkness
• Seablogger
• Thomas Hobbs
• Blog Lodge
• Leibman Theory
• Goliard Dream
•
Third Level Digression
• Here Inside
• My Stupid Dog
• W.J. Duquette


Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
• Andrew Sullivan
• The Corner at National Review
• Steve Sailer
• Samizdata
• Junius
• Joanne Jacobs
• CalPundit
• Natalie Solent
• A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
• Rational Parenting
• Public Interest.co.uk
• Colby Cosh
• View from the Right
• Pejman Pundit
• Spleenville
• God of the Machine
• One Good Turn
• CinderellaBloggerfella
• Liberty Log
• Daily Pundit
• InstaPundit
• MindFloss
• Catallaxy Files
• Greatest Jeneration
• Glenn Frazier
• Jane Galt
• Jim Miller
• Limbic Nutrition
• Innocents Abroad
• Chicago Boyz
• James Lileks
• Cybrarian at Large
• Hello Bloggy!
• Setting the World to Rights
• Travelling Shoes


Miscellaneous
• Redwood Dragon
• IMAO
• The Invisible Hand
• ScrappleFace
• Daze Reader
• Lynn Sislo
• The Fat Guy
• Jon Walz

Links


Our Last 50 Referrers







« The Case of the Missing Insignia | Main | How Significant Is It? »

October 05, 2006

"Font" or "Typeface"?

Michael Blowhard writes:

Dear Blowhards --

Allan Haley explains the difference between a "font" and a "typeface." He also argues that we should be more careful in how we use the words.

I understand Haley's point and am sympathetic. I have my own streaks of language-usage persnickitiness -- back here, for example, I expressed my exasperation with the common misuse of the phrase "begging the question."

But, practically speaking, where "font" and "typeface" are concerned? I suspect that Haley is fighting a language-usage war that was lost several years ago.

Best,

Michael

posted by Michael at October 5, 2006




Comments

The distinction is not entirely without practical meaning. Most typefaces are inherently in the public domain, but computer fonts can be and are copyrighted.

Posted by: Daniel Newby on October 5, 2006 7:17 PM



Only the exact file per se is copyrightable(ie as 'software'). Type designs and their defining characteristics cannot be copy protected in the US, unlike Europe.

Font=Digital File
Type/Typeface= Aesthetic theorum

Posted by: Eric on October 5, 2006 9:00 PM



I followed your link, and I now realize I misuse "begging the question." Thanks for setting me straight, but I think pragmatically its definition has in fact been replaced with "makes me wonder." It's the more straightforward definition, really---a question is begging to be asked---rather than all that "the supposition needs as much proof as the conclusion" stuff. It's that kind of thing that makes my hurt about math.

Posted by: annette on October 6, 2006 10:10 AM



As a former typesetter and long-time grammar and usage nerd, I agree with the commenter who wrote the following:

Absolut Rubbish Mr H! A typeface is the family design (Futura), a font is the variant design (Futura Extra Bold Condensed). You're confusing rather than clarifying.

Posted by: beloml on October 6, 2006 3:50 PM



belomi,

Typeface/Type Family is the aesthetic construct (family included) and in 21st century terms FONT is a digital file. FOUNT (pre-phototype)is a variant.
If it's not the file, what do I purchase and install on my computer?

Posted by: Eric on October 9, 2006 12:59 AM






Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:



Remember your info?