In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff


We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.







Try Advanced Search


  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...


CultureBlogs
Sasha Castel
AC Douglas
Out of Lascaux
The Ambler
PhilosoBlog
Modern Art Notes
Cranky Professor
Mike Snider on Poetry
Silliman on Poetry
Felix Salmon
Gregdotorg
BookSlut
Polly Frost
Polly and Ray's Forum
Cronaca
Plep
Stumbling Tongue
Brian's Culture Blog
Banana Oil
Scourge of Modernism
Visible Darkness
Seablogger
Thomas Hobbs
Blog Lodge
Leibman Theory
Goliard Dream
Third Level Digression
Here Inside
My Stupid Dog
W.J. Duquette


Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
Andrew Sullivan
The Corner at National Review
Steve Sailer
Samizdata
Junius
Joanne Jacobs
CalPundit
Natalie Solent
A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
Rational Parenting
Public Interest.co.uk
Colby Cosh
View from the Right
Pejman Pundit
Spleenville
God of the Machine
One Good Turn
CinderellaBloggerfella
Liberty Log
Daily Pundit
InstaPundit
MindFloss
Catallaxy Files
Greatest Jeneration
Glenn Frazier
Jane Galt
Jim Miller
Limbic Nutrition
Innocents Abroad
Chicago Boyz
James Lileks
Cybrarian at Large
Hello Bloggy!
Setting the World to Rights
Travelling Shoes


Miscellaneous
Redwood Dragon
IMAO
The Invisible Hand
ScrappleFace
Daze Reader
Lynn Sislo
The Fat Guy
Jon Walz

Links


Our Last 50 Referrers







« Mambo Bomb-o | Main | Moviegoing: "The Passenger" »

November 29, 2005

Pronunciation is Bad (Advertising)

Donald Pittenger writes:

Dear Blowhards --

Ever notice print advertisements where the headline is in the form of those pronunciation guides found in dictionaries? Sorry I can't find an example to display or link to, but what you get looks something like this (if your computer can match mine's symbol set, that is):

Thĭs ĭz Hrd t Fŏl

(Actually, the "Th" should have a line through it and the first two "o"s and the final one should have horizontal lines over them -- this is the best I can mimic my dictionary.)

I suppose my failing here is that I have an irrational aversion to pronunciation symbols (though, perversely, I use 'em when I need 'em). Sort of like sentence diagramming. Big-time rear-pains when I was in grammar school.

What's more, I can't imagine what the copywriter and art director were thinking when they created advertisements with symbol-strewn headlines.

Did they think the headline could be easily scanned?

Who were they trying to reach?

And who were they trying to impress? -- their Fifth Grade teachers?

Did they ever think it might be a turn-off to oddballs like moi?

Reactions, anyone?

Later,

Donald

posted by Donald at November 29, 2005




Comments

Ah, but look at it this way. You noticed the advertisements. That means they're working.

Posted by: Peter on November 29, 2005 9:23 PM



Heh. I wonder if a picture of a diagrammed sentence would prompt readers to stop and puzzlee it out?

Posted by: Brian on November 29, 2005 10:39 PM



I too have been noticing the pronunciation symbol adverts lately. They are usually accompanied by Michael's "nonsense brackets." Heh.

Posted by: Cody on November 29, 2005 11:35 PM



I think they're mainly designed to attract attention. Unfortunately, now they remind me of the college (or high school) essay that begins with "Webster's defines ______ as _____________."

It's a strategy whose time has come and gone.

Posted by: Dave Munger on November 30, 2005 6:40 AM



Related to this is the phenomenon of putting nonsensical umlauts (the two dots) over certain brand names.

Posted by: beloml on November 30, 2005 10:09 AM



Maybe they are there for folks who listen to audio books instead of doing the real thing and picking up one in print....;o)

Posted by: Deb on November 30, 2005 4:43 PM



Hay, hoo sez awdiobook fanz kain't rede?

Posted by: Michael Blowhard on November 30, 2005 4:54 PM



Peter -- Well, getting noticed is an essential step in the advertising-to-sale process. But everything is wasted unless the final step -- eliciting the desired action -- occurs. Yes the ads with those marks get my attention but they are, for me, a total turn-off: no action elicited.

Dave -- Yep. Actually, I grind my teeth when almost any ad or article or whatever throws in a dictionary definition. Generally destroys the reading flow.

beloml -- Since I know some German, the umlaut pain for me is real!

Posted by: Donald Pittenger on November 30, 2005 8:42 PM






Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:



Remember your info?