2blowhards.com: Random Visual Attack 1

In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff

We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.

CultureBlogs
• Sasha Castel
• AC Douglas
• Out of Lascaux
• The Ambler
• PhilosoBlog
• Modern Art Notes
• Cranky Professor
• Mike Snider on Poetry
• Silliman on Poetry
• Felix Salmon
• Gregdotorg
• BookSlut
• Polly Frost
• Polly and Ray's Forum
• Cronaca
• Plep
• Stumbling Tongue
• Brian's Culture Blog
• Banana Oil
• Scourge of Modernism
• Visible Darkness
• Seablogger
• Thomas Hobbs
• Blog Lodge
• Leibman Theory
• Goliard Dream
• Third Level Digression
• Here Inside
• My Stupid Dog
• W.J. Duquette

Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
• Andrew Sullivan
• The Corner at National Review
• Steve Sailer
• Samizdata
• Junius
• Joanne Jacobs
• CalPundit
• Natalie Solent
• A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
• Rational Parenting
• Public Interest.co.uk
• Colby Cosh
• View from the Right
• Pejman Pundit
• Spleenville
• God of the Machine
• One Good Turn
• CinderellaBloggerfella
• Liberty Log
• Daily Pundit
• InstaPundit
• MindFloss
• Catallaxy Files
• Greatest Jeneration
• Glenn Frazier
• Jane Galt
• Jim Miller
• Limbic Nutrition
• Innocents Abroad
• Chicago Boyz
• James Lileks
• Cybrarian at Large
• Hello Bloggy!
• Setting the World to Rights
• Travelling Shoes

Miscellaneous
• Redwood Dragon
• IMAO
• The Invisible Hand
• ScrappleFace
• Daze Reader
• Lynn Sislo
• The Fat Guy
• Jon Walz

Links

Our Last 50 Referrers

« Hometown USA | Main | Random Visual Attack 2 »

August 23, 2005

Random Visual Attack 1

Michael Blowhard writes:

Dear Blowhards --

It doesn't take much encouragement to get me to inflict more of my bad photographs on visitors! Here's a shot of backlit leaves and flowers -- very Victorian, no? Would you have guessed that this photo was taken in Manhattan?

Best,

Michael

posted by Michael at August 23, 2005

Comments

It's beautiful- you should indulge us in your photographic meanderings more often, please. I like the eye candy, personally.

Posted by: Jill on August 23, 2005 09:20 AM

Pretty picture! But I thought you said you only think of the "good shot" after you put the camera away! This is pretty good.

Posted by: annette on August 23, 2005 12:16 PM

D.H. Laurence' colors: coral/yellow/green. Against all (4, actually) prescribed color schemes. Dark! Messy! Perverisive!

Love it.

Posted by: Tatyana on August 23, 2005 02:15 PM

My photographic method boils down to: If you take a couple of thousand shots, at least two or three of them have to wind up being semi-presentable.

I wonder what the secret to being a genuinely good photographer is. I've had the chance to hang out a bit with real photographers, and it really is amazing: nearly every shot they take is an interesting and striking one. They must be able to see what the camera is taking much better than the rest of us do. I kind of though that the little LCD screens would even that score more than they do - that I'd get more of a sense of the finished photo that way. And I guess I do, but just a bit. I'm still surprised -- very surprised -- by how my snapshots actually turn out.

How does everyone else like the LCD screens on digital cameras? I like 'em, but they haven't turned me into a good photographer, darn it...

Posted by: Michael Blowhard on August 24, 2005 12:16 AM