In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff

We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.

Try Advanced Search

  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...

Sasha Castel
AC Douglas
Out of Lascaux
The Ambler
Modern Art Notes
Cranky Professor
Mike Snider on Poetry
Silliman on Poetry
Felix Salmon
Polly Frost
Polly and Ray's Forum
Stumbling Tongue
Brian's Culture Blog
Banana Oil
Scourge of Modernism
Visible Darkness
Thomas Hobbs
Blog Lodge
Leibman Theory
Goliard Dream
Third Level Digression
Here Inside
My Stupid Dog
W.J. Duquette

Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
Andrew Sullivan
The Corner at National Review
Steve Sailer
Joanne Jacobs
Natalie Solent
A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
Rational Parenting
Colby Cosh
View from the Right
Pejman Pundit
God of the Machine
One Good Turn
Liberty Log
Daily Pundit
Catallaxy Files
Greatest Jeneration
Glenn Frazier
Jane Galt
Jim Miller
Limbic Nutrition
Innocents Abroad
Chicago Boyz
James Lileks
Cybrarian at Large
Hello Bloggy!
Setting the World to Rights
Travelling Shoes

Redwood Dragon
The Invisible Hand
Daze Reader
Lynn Sislo
The Fat Guy
Jon Walz


Our Last 50 Referrers

« Slow Woodstock? | Main | The Fate of the Six Pack »

July 31, 2008

Quote for the Day

Michael Blowhard writes:

Dear Blowhards --

What explains the fantastic amount of resources that Americans have thrown into combating a nonexistent Muslim threat to the United States, while acquiescing to decades-long encroachment by illegal aliens?




posted by Michael at July 31, 2008


A PCR column that won't be carried by Counterpunch.

Posted by: icr on August 1, 2008 8:25 AM

1.3 million gone! Another decade, and your illegal alien problem is solved. Get rid of anchor babies, chain migration, and America just might survive the onslaught of the third world.

There's hope for you yet. Maybe I do believe in God, after all.

Posted by: PatrickH on August 1, 2008 9:33 AM

Actually, they're both a little dangerous.

Posted by: Charlton Griffin on August 1, 2008 10:16 AM

3000 dead and tens of billion dollars in damage isn't exactly nothing, Paul. Of course, Roberts went off the deep end a long time ago, and I don't bother reading him any more. The few good points he makes are so deeply buried in layers of Bush Derangement Syndrome, it's not worth it. He does have a point about illegal immigration, though.

Posted by: tschafer on August 1, 2008 10:44 AM

If the Islamic terror threat in this country is as bad -- or even as half as bad -- as the administration and others have portrayed it to be, the border should have been sealed shortly after 9-11. Before the current Iraq war started the adminstration itself brought up the possibility of Iraqi sponsored terrorists attacking the U.S. at the same time they did little (if anything?) to beef up the border. A working press would have asked why the administration did not believe its own lies. They are criminally negligent if the threat is as they portray it to be.

It is interesting that the administration has increased its enforcement efforts recently, making quite a show of their small inadequate enforcement measures. One wonders if they want some cover in the event that a terrorist attack, which came in the southern border door, takes place when they are out of office.

As for the threat of illegal immigration, let's just say those who have aided and abetted it are traitors plain and simple.


Posted by: sN on August 2, 2008 12:31 AM

I don't think we need any more psychotic Russian women in the US, but where I live I am surrounded by illegal aliens from Mexico and Central America who man the counters at every fast food place in the city. They are not working for less than minimum wage, so god bless 'em.

Posted by: Sister Wolf on August 2, 2008 2:20 AM

They say the Indians got a bad deal in Manhattan. Sister Wolf will sell California for a chimichanga. Goddamn 'er.


Posted by: sN on August 2, 2008 2:55 PM

I dunno.
Possibly that it's easy to scare people with the idea of undetected terrorists plotting the destruction of America's great cities... and less so with the idea of a load of people who really want to live in the US. ?

Posted by: Nigel on August 2, 2008 3:51 PM

The perfidy of the Bush administration and likely that of any Democratic one lies in the paradixical policies of allowing immigration and student visa arrivals from Muslim countries while clamping down on our liberties to prevent Muslim terror from happening.

Posted by: PA on August 2, 2008 5:03 PM

Post a comment

Email Address:



Remember your info?