In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff


We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.







Try Advanced Search


  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...


CultureBlogs
Sasha Castel
AC Douglas
Out of Lascaux
The Ambler
PhilosoBlog
Modern Art Notes
Cranky Professor
Mike Snider on Poetry
Silliman on Poetry
Felix Salmon
Gregdotorg
BookSlut
Polly Frost
Polly and Ray's Forum
Cronaca
Plep
Stumbling Tongue
Brian's Culture Blog
Banana Oil
Scourge of Modernism
Visible Darkness
Seablogger
Thomas Hobbs
Blog Lodge
Leibman Theory
Goliard Dream
Third Level Digression
Here Inside
My Stupid Dog
W.J. Duquette


Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
Andrew Sullivan
The Corner at National Review
Steve Sailer
Samizdata
Junius
Joanne Jacobs
CalPundit
Natalie Solent
A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
Rational Parenting
Public Interest.co.uk
Colby Cosh
View from the Right
Pejman Pundit
Spleenville
God of the Machine
One Good Turn
CinderellaBloggerfella
Liberty Log
Daily Pundit
InstaPundit
MindFloss
Catallaxy Files
Greatest Jeneration
Glenn Frazier
Jane Galt
Jim Miller
Limbic Nutrition
Innocents Abroad
Chicago Boyz
James Lileks
Cybrarian at Large
Hello Bloggy!
Setting the World to Rights
Travelling Shoes


Miscellaneous
Redwood Dragon
IMAO
The Invisible Hand
ScrappleFace
Daze Reader
Lynn Sislo
The Fat Guy
Jon Walz

Links


Our Last 50 Referrers







« Too Much Glass | Main | Keegan and His Zigzags »

October 04, 2007

Dept. of Belaboring the Obvious

Michael Blowhard writes:

Dear Blowhards --

Is this a sentence that really needed to be written: "Sexual activity and orgasm have been shown to reduce stress (Charnetski & Brennan, 2001)."

I found this humdinger in "The Science of Orgasm," by Barry R. Komisaruk, Carlos Beyer-Flores, and Beverly Whipple, a book published by the prestigious Johns Hopkins Press. I'm sure glad that Komisaruk, Beyer-Flores, and Whipple cited a source to support their controversial statement!

Best,

Michael

posted by Michael at October 4, 2007




Comments

One of my jobs involved putting Federal documents on CDs for searching up statutes and regulations. This was the actual definition of death of a lab animal as defined by the FDA:

"Lack of reaction to gentle prodding."


Imagine how different our lives would be were that the definition of human death.

And I love the inclusion of "gentle" - like that had to be spelled out.

Posted by: yahmdallah on October 5, 2007 12:18 AM



That's a riot. Sounds like a description of me after a day at the office.

Posted by: Michael Blowhard on October 5, 2007 12:26 AM



That's one of the funniest sentences I've ever read. Should be an album title.

Posted by: the patriarch on October 5, 2007 10:25 AM



14. Charnetski & Brennan, 2001 (op. cit.). The data were derived from a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study of 400 graduate students. One group was given sexual activity 7x/day for 3 weeks, with stress levels tested 1x/day on the Fleed/Coriander Scale. The control group was given basket weaving exercises as a placebo 7x/day for 3 weeks, with stress levels measured at the same intervals and using the same methodology as the sexually treated group. Measurements confirmed that the sex-treated group had a median 47 percent less stress at the end of the study, which a chi-square test found to be statistically significant (p = 0.01). Anecdotal evidence confirmed the results.

Posted by: Rick Darby on October 5, 2007 12:21 PM






Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:



Remember your info?