In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff


We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.







Try Advanced Search


  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...


CultureBlogs
Sasha Castel
AC Douglas
Out of Lascaux
The Ambler
PhilosoBlog
Modern Art Notes
Cranky Professor
Mike Snider on Poetry
Silliman on Poetry
Felix Salmon
Gregdotorg
BookSlut
Polly Frost
Polly and Ray's Forum
Cronaca
Plep
Stumbling Tongue
Brian's Culture Blog
Banana Oil
Scourge of Modernism
Visible Darkness
Seablogger
Thomas Hobbs
Blog Lodge
Leibman Theory
Goliard Dream
Third Level Digression
Here Inside
My Stupid Dog
W.J. Duquette


Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
Andrew Sullivan
The Corner at National Review
Steve Sailer
Samizdata
Junius
Joanne Jacobs
CalPundit
Natalie Solent
A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
Rational Parenting
Public Interest.co.uk
Colby Cosh
View from the Right
Pejman Pundit
Spleenville
God of the Machine
One Good Turn
CinderellaBloggerfella
Liberty Log
Daily Pundit
InstaPundit
MindFloss
Catallaxy Files
Greatest Jeneration
Glenn Frazier
Jane Galt
Jim Miller
Limbic Nutrition
Innocents Abroad
Chicago Boyz
James Lileks
Cybrarian at Large
Hello Bloggy!
Setting the World to Rights
Travelling Shoes


Miscellaneous
Redwood Dragon
IMAO
The Invisible Hand
ScrappleFace
Daze Reader
Lynn Sislo
The Fat Guy
Jon Walz

Links


Our Last 50 Referrers







« Matte Painting | Main | At Right Reason »

July 08, 2007

Support Steve

Michael Blowhard writes:

Dear Blowhards --

I don't know of any journalist who is doing more than Steve Sailer to get some urgently-in-need-of-recognition-and-discussion topics and stories into play. Given that this is anything but a surefire pathway to success in the journalism game, Steve's activities are bringing him far more notoriety and fans than remuneration. So if you value Steve's contributions and want to see them go on, why not join me in taking part in Steve's current fundraising drive.

Best,

Michael

posted by Michael at July 8, 2007




Comments


dear Michael:

I wish that I could contribute to Steven's drive, but I am Hispanic, and I do not see why I should contribute to someone who sees me as a danger to his country and his ethnic group.

I may be generous and fair minded, but I am not a fool.

Posted by: Adriana on July 10, 2007 1:13 PM



So Mr. Sailer shouldn't notice and write about topics like Mexican crony capitalism and the questionable influence of Mexican plutocrats like Carlos Slim...because you feel he is not being sufficiently supportive of Mexican immigration to the U.S., legal or otherwise, into the U.S.? Or is support for that population transfer a prequalification for writing about Mexico generally?

http://www.vdare.com/sailer/070708_slim.htm

I'm a little confused; how exactly how do you justify calling yourself "fair minded" or "generous" in this context?

Posted by: Friedrich von Blowhard on July 10, 2007 2:43 PM




I am sorry, it was none of those things that I object to. It was a general tone that put me off. An article in wich he says that "We got to encourage white people to have more children so that we don't get swamped by Hispanics and black"

Which means that for him "We" does not include hispanics and blacks, and that he sees me (by the way I am not Mexican - not all Hispanics are Mexican) as an alien threat.

So, I cannot in good conscience support him.

Call it self-respect.

Posted by: Adriana on July 10, 2007 3:45 PM



Ms. Adriana:

I brought up the Carlos Slim piece on purpose to make a point: in this culture, if you notice things like Mexican crony capitalism, you will be accused, sooner rather than later, of anti-Hispanic racism. If you notice that the term Hispanic (a dubious neologism of the 1970s) has been used to give "racial" cover to an immense transfer of Mexican citizens to the U.S., you will be accused of racism. If you notice that in a recent study of California demographics that Non-Hispanic White women have an average lifetime fertility of 1.83 children, Non-Hispanic Black women have an average lifetime fertility of 1.80 children, Non-Hispanic Asian women have an average lifetime fertility of 1.80 children, while Hispanic women have a average lifetime fertility rate of 2.33 children (note the gap), you will be accused of racism.

Question: have you ever been accused of racism? Do you know how it feels to have people throw that accusation at you to shut you up? Until you're on the receiving end of that judo move, you may not realize how much moral courage is necessary to do what Mr. Sailer does every week.

Posted by: Friedrich von Blowhard on July 11, 2007 5:12 AM




I did not want to shut him up. I just wanted to note that I felt personally assaulted by the comments.

Noting a fertility gap is one thing, using it to develop a subtext of "They are invading us, they are taking us over, they will swallow us" is another.

As a member of the "us" I feel **personally** threatened by that subtext.

Now you want to shut me up, and accuse me of intolerance and hypocrisy because I let you know of a personal hurt.

I am disappointed in you.

I never wanted to shut Steve up. I only noted that I would not be supporting him in his efforst, as I do not support a hundred of other causes, some worthier than other, for reasons too numerous to count.

Am I forced to support the causes you want me to? Am I to be called names because I decide who to support and not to?

The Government can force me to pay taxes, but it is the only one who can force me to disburse for things I do not support (like the stupid war in Iraq) but you cannot, and calling me names will not change it.

Posted by: Adriana on July 11, 2007 8:42 AM






Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:



Remember your info?