In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff

We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.

Try Advanced Search

  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...

Sasha Castel
AC Douglas
Out of Lascaux
The Ambler
Modern Art Notes
Cranky Professor
Mike Snider on Poetry
Silliman on Poetry
Felix Salmon
Polly Frost
Polly and Ray's Forum
Stumbling Tongue
Brian's Culture Blog
Banana Oil
Scourge of Modernism
Visible Darkness
Thomas Hobbs
Blog Lodge
Leibman Theory
Goliard Dream
Third Level Digression
Here Inside
My Stupid Dog
W.J. Duquette

Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
Andrew Sullivan
The Corner at National Review
Steve Sailer
Joanne Jacobs
Natalie Solent
A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
Rational Parenting
Colby Cosh
View from the Right
Pejman Pundit
God of the Machine
One Good Turn
Liberty Log
Daily Pundit
Catallaxy Files
Greatest Jeneration
Glenn Frazier
Jane Galt
Jim Miller
Limbic Nutrition
Innocents Abroad
Chicago Boyz
James Lileks
Cybrarian at Large
Hello Bloggy!
Setting the World to Rights
Travelling Shoes

Redwood Dragon
The Invisible Hand
Daze Reader
Lynn Sislo
The Fat Guy
Jon Walz


Our Last 50 Referrers

« Case Studies in State Formation - Sparta | Main | Sex/Violence/Ratings »

September 09, 2006

A New "Blair Witch Project"?

Michael Blowhard writes:

Dear Blowhards --

Is star YouTube videoblogger (200,000 views per posting) LonelyGirl15 a real live lonelygirl or just someone's publicity ploy? Doubts have arisen.

UPDATE: Doubts have been confirmed.



posted by Michael at September 9, 2006


Any moron could've figured out it was a fake. A red-hot girl who's quirky, brooding, and *into Feynman* -- and at the unbitten-fruit age of 16 no less! As if! Obviously just softcore geek voyeur porn.

This is why it pays to be paranoid and suspicious -- you never fall for crap like this, even if your too-sensitive antennae thereby sound a lot of false alarms along the way. All the geeks aching to "make her not so lonely" deserve their crushing disillusionment -- that's what you get for being such a clueless sucker!

Posted by: Agnostic on September 11, 2006 12:19 PM

The idea that a girl that looks like that could EVER be lonely is patently absurd.

Posted by: Todd Fletcher on September 11, 2006 12:19 PM

I saw her videos when they were first starting (I believe it was number 2). If anyone was fooled into thinking those videos were legitimate they are just gullible.

The video I saw even had "Episode #[2?]" preceding the content. If that alone isn't enough of a giveaway, how about the relatively sophisticated editing, sound, the girl-next-door-model actress and actors, and the obviously contrived drama?

The videos might be relatively entertaining (I don't know, since I never made it through a full one), but I think the creators of this show should have been upfront from the beginning.

Posted by: Rendition on September 11, 2006 5:28 PM

Guys, I'd wager that the vast majority of those "gullible", "clueless sucker[s]" were simply engaging in belief simultaneous with disbelief. Surely you are familiar with this disposition of our species. Religion, art, romance, humor, sport, advertisement, ceremony -- all, at their finest, about displaced or framed credulity. And, hey, kudos to those geeks -- a cultivated tendency to play back at an actress by acting "sincere" ought to land them bigger prizes in the future than await those of us whose preferred game is to mock them.

Posted by: J. Goard on September 12, 2006 1:50 PM

Well, one of the three "sleuths" who dedicated himself enough to investigating the truth/falsity of this 16-y.o. girl by participating in a sting operation was -- a 36-y.o. computer programmer from Tulsa. That's who's watching these things, and the younger horny nerds -- that's forgivable, since they're too young to have learned that if something looks too good to be true for a nerd, it probably is. But the older guys, yikes.

Posted by: Agnostic on September 12, 2006 8:28 PM

And here I am, 52 and linking to stories like these. Unseemly, I suppose.

Posted by: Michael Blowhard on September 12, 2006 11:06 PM

Post a comment

Email Address:



Remember your info?