In which a group of graying eternal amateurs discuss their passions, interests and obsessions, among them: movies, art, politics, evolutionary biology, taxes, writing, computers, these kids these days, and lousy educations.

E-Mail Donald
Demographer, recovering sociologist, and arts buff

E-Mail Fenster
College administrator and arts buff

E-Mail Francis
Architectural historian and arts buff

E-Mail Friedrich
Entrepreneur and arts buff
E-Mail Michael
Media flunky and arts buff


We assume it's OK to quote emailers by name.







Try Advanced Search


  1. Seattle Squeeze: New Urban Living
  2. Checking In
  3. Ben Aronson's Representational Abstractions
  4. Rock is ... Forever?
  5. We Need the Arts: A Sob Story
  6. Form Following (Commercial) Function
  7. Two Humorous Items from the Financial Crisis
  8. Ken Auster of the Kute Kaptions
  9. What Might Representational Painters Paint?
  10. In The Times ...


CultureBlogs
Sasha Castel
AC Douglas
Out of Lascaux
The Ambler
PhilosoBlog
Modern Art Notes
Cranky Professor
Mike Snider on Poetry
Silliman on Poetry
Felix Salmon
Gregdotorg
BookSlut
Polly Frost
Polly and Ray's Forum
Cronaca
Plep
Stumbling Tongue
Brian's Culture Blog
Banana Oil
Scourge of Modernism
Visible Darkness
Seablogger
Thomas Hobbs
Blog Lodge
Leibman Theory
Goliard Dream
Third Level Digression
Here Inside
My Stupid Dog
W.J. Duquette


Politics, Education, and Economics Blogs
Andrew Sullivan
The Corner at National Review
Steve Sailer
Samizdata
Junius
Joanne Jacobs
CalPundit
Natalie Solent
A Libertarian Parent in the Countryside
Rational Parenting
Public Interest.co.uk
Colby Cosh
View from the Right
Pejman Pundit
Spleenville
God of the Machine
One Good Turn
CinderellaBloggerfella
Liberty Log
Daily Pundit
InstaPundit
MindFloss
Catallaxy Files
Greatest Jeneration
Glenn Frazier
Jane Galt
Jim Miller
Limbic Nutrition
Innocents Abroad
Chicago Boyz
James Lileks
Cybrarian at Large
Hello Bloggy!
Setting the World to Rights
Travelling Shoes


Miscellaneous
Redwood Dragon
IMAO
The Invisible Hand
ScrappleFace
Daze Reader
Lynn Sislo
The Fat Guy
Jon Walz

Links


Our Last 50 Referrers







« Elsewhere | Main | Underserved Audiences »

February 26, 2004

Bay Area Figurative Artists

Dear Friedrich --

By Wonner; by Peterson

The San Francisco painters David Park (here), Richard Diebenkorn (here) and Elmer Bischoff (here) are three of my favorite 20th century artists, but the loose school they represent -- Bay Area Figurative painting -- included many other talented, if less well-known, artists too. Here's a page devoted to one of them, Paul Wonner; here's one devoted to another, Roland Peterson. I think many people who are wary of modernism might find the work of these painters surprisingly agreeable. It's casual, atmospheric, and pleasure-centric -- 1920s Paris via the Golden Gate, a bohemian utopia that smells of the Pacific.

The Hackett-Freedman Gallery handles work by a lot of these guys, and their website (here) is itself an informative and helpful thing of beauty. Caroline Jones' wonderful book, Bay Area Figurative Art: 1950-1965, can be bought here.

Are you a fan too?

Best,

Michael

posted by Michael at February 26, 2004




Comments

All of the Bay Area artists share a love of large flat (relatively flat) planes of color. Very appealing.

There is an American artist, John Hultberg, who interestingly, grew up in the bay area and then came east. You might want to give his work a look. At Google, the second listing, rogallery.com, will take you to a selection of it.
The same love of flat planes.

Posted by: ricpic on February 26, 2004 2:46 PM



Frankly, I know less than I should about the whole school; thanks particularly for showing some examples of Wonner and Peterson's work, both of which I really like.

Posted by: Friedrich von Blowhard on February 26, 2004 3:49 PM



there's maybe 1 or 2 Diebenkorns on view at any one time at SFMOMA. I tell you it's a crime.

Posted by: nick kallen on February 26, 2004 5:40 PM



Amen Nick, amen. I have NEVER seen a figurative Diebenkorn on view at SF MOMA (not even one on loan). (The exception, of course, is the retro from a few years back.)

And while I don't live in LA, I get to LACMA a lot. And I've only seen one on view at a time there.

Posted by: Tyler Green on March 3, 2004 10:38 PM



Wow, that does seem odd. Though I'm confused -- they don't put Diebenkorns in general on view? Or just the figurative Diebenkorns?

Posted by: Michael Blowhard on March 3, 2004 10:44 PM



I spent a fair amount of time during grad school painting exactly like David Park. If the world was a better place, Bay Area figuration would have become the major historical art movement to follow abstract expressionism. Instead that honor went to pop art.

Posted by: Franklin on March 4, 2004 2:13 PM



Last time I was at SF MOMA they had a Berkeley abstraction on view (and maybe an Ocean Park -- which may have been on loan from a trustee or something... I don't quite remember). I don't think they own a major figurative Diebenkorn.

Posted by: Tyler Green on March 4, 2004 2:16 PM



I've always loved the bay area Fig. artists since i was turned onto them. One of my teachers had the book and i was smitten immediately. Subsequently i bought the book and it is one of my treasures.. I live north of n.y.c. and just saw a few paintings of Wonner's at the Silvermine gallery in Ct. They were fantastic! Do you know if there are any other published works of Wonners ? these were still lifes. I will check out J. Holtberg. thanks.TP

Posted by: Terry Pesso on March 14, 2004 8:43 PM






Post a comment
Name:


Email Address:


URL:


Comments:



Remember your info?